Lives & Letters Mailing: May 2017

Lives & Letters Mailing: May 2017

 

Dear Colleagues,

Welcome to another Lives & Letters Mailing. This month’s mailing contains information about:

1. Whites Writing Whiteness: Project News
2. New issue of a/b 32.2 “What’s Next? The Futures of Auto/Biography Studies”
3. Mass Observation’s 80th Anniversary Conference, 10-11 July 2017
4. [MASSOBS] REMINDER: 12th May Diary Day
5. new publication: The Phenomenology of Autobiography: Making it Real
6. Memories, Marks and Imprints (5/31/2017; 11/20-21/2017) France
7. Unplotted Stories: Creative Essays on Living Without a Relationship Script (8/1/2017) Edited Collection

——————————

1. Whites Writing Whiteness: Project News

We at Whites Writing Whiteness would like to call your attention to the new Spring issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies. Among many of the interesting contents, this contains a new article by Liz Stanley and Margaretta Jolly, titled ‘Epistolarity: Life after Death of the Letter?’. Full details and contents of the new issue are provided in the following item.

Readers of the Whites Writing Whiteness blog will know we are presently at work on several exciting matters. There is a considerable amount of new material on the website – particularly in Traces and Curiosities, but also including new entries in Archives, so do look at these pages for new contributions. There is also work going on in producing the final version of the project’s website, in particular by folks at HRI Online at Sheffield, while we are busy finishing a book about the project’s research. To read more about these developments, please visit the blog: http://www.whiteswritingwhiteness.ed.ac.uk/blog/

——————————

2. New issue of a/b 32.2 “What’s Next? The Futures of Auto/Biography Studies”

The editors of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies are pleased to say that they have just published issue 32.2 (Spring 2017). This issue is comprised of discursive mini-essays conversing on the topic of what’s next in auto/biography studies. Enjoy!

Individual subscriptions may be purchased for US $35. Please contact societies@tandf.co.uk for more information.

Special Issue 32.2
“What’s Next? The Futures of Auto/Biography Studies”
Edited by Emily Hipchen and Ricia Anne Chansky
Contributing Editor Krista E. Roberts

Foreword

Barbara Sher [bsherny@earthlink.net] and Rebecca Hogan, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Emerita [hoganr@uww.edu]

Introduction

“Looking Forward: The Futures of Auto/Biography Studies”
Emily Hipchen, University of West Georgia [emilyhipchen@gmail.com] and Ricia Anne Chansky, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez [ricia.chansky@upr.edu]

Trajectories

“A New Genre in the Making?” Phillipe Lejeune, l’Université Paris-Nord [philippe.lejeune@autopacte.org]

“Derailment: Going Offline to be Online” Julie Rak, University of Alberta [jrak@ualberta.ca]

“The Transnational, Global, and the Planetary” Philip Holden, National University of Singapore [ellhpj@nus.edu.sg]

“Migrations and Metamorphoses” Eva C. Karpinski, York University [evakarp@yorku.ca]

“Exilic-Diasporic Life Writing and Human Rights: a Diasporic Iranian Perspective” Nima Naghibi, Ryerson University [nnaghibi@ryerson.ca]

“Life Writing in and beyond the Anglophone World” Alfred Hornung, Johannes Gutenberg University [hornung@uni-mainz.de]

“Transpacific Life Writing” Nicole Poppenhagen, Europa-Universität [nicole.poppenhagen@uni-flensburg.de]

“Graphic Narratives” Candida Rifkind, The University of Winnipeg [c.rifkind@uwinnipeg.ca]

“New Directions in African American Autobiography Studies” Joycelyn K. Moody, University of Texas at San Antonio [joycelyn.moody@utsa.edu]

“How’s Life? Auto/biography Studies Thirty Years from Here” Craig Howes, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa [craighow@hawaii.edu]

“Where Now?” Nigel Hamilton, University of Massachusetts Boston [nigel.hamilton@umb.edu]

“A Life A Life A Life: Alive! And Retiring from Life Writing?” Franziska Gygax, Universität Basel [franziska.gygax@unibas.ch]

“A Backward Glance” Nancy K. Miller, The Graduate Center, CUNY [nancy@nancykmiller.com]

Inter-lives

“The Futures of Biohistorical Reconstructions of Clinical Cases from the Cobb Research Laboratory” Fatimah L. C. Jackson, Howard University [fatimah.jackson@howard.edu]

“Genomes, or the Book of Life Itself” Pramod K. Nayar, University of Hyderabad [pramodknayar@gmail.com]

“Debts” Marianne Hirsch, Columbia University [mh2349@columbia.edu]

“Caste and Class in the Nineteenth-Century Slave Narrative” William L. Andrews, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [wandrews@email.unc.edu]

“Epistolarity: Life after Death of the Letter?” Liz Stanley, The University of Edinburgh [liz.stanley@ed.ac.uk] and Margaretta Jolly, University of Sussex [m.jolly@sussex.ac.uk]

“Fictionality” James Phelan, The Ohio State University [phelan.1@osu.edu]

“Historical and Biographical Lyric” Page Richards, The University of Hong Kong [pkerr@hku.hk]

“Storying the Self: A View on Autobiography from Developmental Psychology” Robyn Fivush, Emory University [psyrf@emory.edu]

“Collaboration” Maria Faini, University of California at Berkeley [sgroi@berkeley.edu]; Orly Lael Netzer, University of Alberta [laelnetz@ualberta.ca]; and, Emma Maguire, Monash University [emma.maguire@monash.edu]

“Collaborative Autoethnography as Multivocal, Relational, and Democratic Research: Opportunities, Challenges, and Aspirations” Heewon Chang, Eastern University [hchang@eastern.edu]; Kathy-Ann C. Hernandez, Eastern University [khernand@eastern.edu]; and, Faith Wambura Ngunjiri, Concordia College [fngunjir@cord.edu]

“The Self as Evidence and Collaborative Identity in Contemporary Autobiographical Documentary” Leah Anderst, Queensborough Community College, CUNY [landerst@qcc.cuny.edu]

“The Autobiographical Turn in Representing History in Chinese Films” Jing Meng, The University of Nottingham Ningbo [jing.meng@nottingham.edu.cn]

“What’s Next? Mediation” Anna Poletti, Universiteit Utrecht [a.l.poletti@uu.nl]

“Privacy” John David Zuern, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa [zuern@hawaii.edu]

“Does Autobiography Have a Future?” Paul John Eakin, Indiana University Bloomington [eakin@indiana.edu]

Reframing Discourses

“The Material Turn, Life and Writing” Alexis Harley, La Trobe University [a.harley@latrobe.edu.au]

“After Auto, After Bio: Posthumanism and Life Writing” Cynthia A. Huff, Illinois State University [cahuff@ilstu.edu]

“Voices from a ‘Valley of Dry Bones’: Life Narratives of the Slave Trade from St Helena” Andrew Pearson, University of Bristol [andy@pearsonarchaeology.com]

“Sally and Molly: Life History, Black Girlhood, and the Future of the Field” Colleen A. Vasconcellos, University of West Georgia [cvasconc@westga.edu]

“Autobiographical Narratives in Education: What Can be expected from this Binomial in Education, Health, and Everyday Life?” Maria da Conceição Passeggi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte [mariapasseggi@gmail.com]

“Autobiographical Graphic ‘Novels’ of Childhood” Michael Chaney, Dartmouth University [michael.chaney@dartmouth.edu]

“Childhood and Youth” Kate Douglas, Flinders University [kate.douglas@flinders.edu.au]

“Testimony” Leigh Gilmore, Wellesley College [leighgilmore@me.com]

“Against Erasures: Why Life Writing Scholars Should Address the Nakba” Cynthia G. Franklin, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa [cfrankli@hawaii.edu]

“Victor Montejo as Example of the Emergence of Indigenous Subjectivities” Arturo Arias, University of California, Merced [aarias26@ucmerced.edu]

“The Future of African Women’s Autobiography” Folasade Hunsu, Obafemi Awolowo University [oyinhunsu@yahoo.com]

“Defying the Rules” Carol DeBoer-Langworthy, Brown University [carol_deboer-langworthy@brown.edu]

Saving Lives

“Autobiography as Foucauldian Askēsis: Care of the Self and Care of Others” Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University [jeong-hee.kim@ttu.edu]
“Beading the Sash” Qwo-Li Driskill, Oregon State University [qwo-li.driskill@oregonstate.edu]

“Oral history as Auto/biography through Embodied Performance: A Look at the Narratives of the Early Twentieth-Century Afro-Curaçaoan Migrants to Cuba” Rose Mary Allen, University of Curaçao [adr550@hotmail.com]

“Institutionalization of Shiite Muslim Life-Writing: The Iranian Historic Experience” Muhammad-Reza Fakhr-Rohani, University of Qom [abumahdi1061@gmail.com]

“The Futures of Biofiction Studies” Michael Lackey, University of Minnesota, Morris [lacke010@morris.umn.edu]

“The Future of Autobiography Studies: The Diary” Kylie Cardell, Flinders University [kylie.cardell@flinders.edu.au]

“Brazilian Auto/biographic Voices from Archive Materials” Sergio da Silva Barcellos, Independent Scholar [barcellossergio@aol.com]

“The Archive” Leena Kurvet-Käosaar, Tartu Ülikool [lkk@ut.ee]

“The Visual Turn and the Digital Revolution” Maria Tamboukou, University of East London [maria@uel-exchange.uel.ac.uk]

“Memory, Digital Media, and Life Writing” Eleanor Ty, Wilfrid Laurier University [ety@wlu.ca]

“Future’s Memory” Gunnþórunn Guðmundsdóttir, Háskóli Íslands [gunnth@hi.is]

“Data Portraits: Identity, Privacy and Surveillance” Paul Arthur, Edith Cowan University [pwlarthur@gmail.com]

“Signs of Life” Harvey Young, Northwestern University [harvey@northwestern.edu]

“The Future of Life Writing: Body Stories” G. Thomas Couser, Hofstra University [g.t.couser@hofstra.edu]

Forum. IABA Graduate Student and New Scholars Network: What’s Next?
“Students and New Scholars: A Conversation” Maria Faini, Orly Lael Netzer, and Emma Maguire

“Biographic Mediation” Ebony Coletu, Penn State University [coletu@psu.edu]

“As-Told-To Life Writing: Narratives of Self and Other” Sandra Lindemann, Independent Scholar [lindemannsandra0@gmail.com]

“Life Writing and the Life Course” Ashley Barnwell, University of Melbourne [ashley.barnwell@unimelb.edu.au]

“Making the ‘Structures’ Speak: Migrant Biographies across Time” Joanna Sousa Ribeiro, University of Coimbra [joanasribeiro@ces.uc.pt]

“Cartography” Alex Winder, New York University [alexdwinder@gmail.com]

“Eco-autobiography: Writing Self through Place” Melanie Pryor, Flinders University [pryo0022@uni.flinders.edu.au]

“Autobiography’s Other: The Untold Life Narratives from Sub-Saharan Africa” Delphine Fongang, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater [fongangd@uww.edu]

“Indigenizing Auto/biography Studies in Pursuit of Inclusive Classrooms” Lucinda Rasmussen, University of Alberta [lmr4@ualberta.ca]

“Trauma Texts in/as Revolutionary Praxis” Dawn Shickluna, University of Toronto [dawn.shickluna@mail.utoronto.ca]

“Trauma, Testimony, and the Art of Therapeutic Portraiture” Gina Dorothy Snooks, University of Western Ontario [gsnooks@uwo.ca]

“Images, Affect, and Activism: The Affect Generated by Personal Testimonies of Sexual Violence in Autobiographical Film” Amanda Spallacci, University of Alberta [spal2410@mylaurier.ca]

“‘Moments and Lustres’: Writing Memoir through Lyric Essay” Marie O’Rourke, Curtin University [marie.orourke@postgrad.curtin.edu.au]

“Correspondence, Peer Support, and Wellness: The Influence of Life Writing on Mental Health” Stephanie E. Butler, Newcastle University [s.e.butler2@newcastle.ac.uk]

“Remaking Obscure Lives as Prosopography in Blogazine” Siu Yin Jessica Yeung, Caritas Institute [jsyyeung@hotmail.com]

“What’s Next for Trans Life Writing?” Ana Horvat, University of Alberta [ahorvat@ualberta.ca]

“The Vulnerability of Contemporary Digital Autobiography” Ümit Kennedy, Western Sydney University [u.kennedy2@westernsydney.edu.au]

“Digital Archives, TEI, and Relationality: Locating Digital Life Writing/ Writing to the Future” Krista Roberts, Illinois State University [krista.e.roberts@gmail.com]

“Rethinking Relationality” Jesse Hutchinson, University of Waterloo [j6hutchi@uwaterloo.ca]

“Fashioning a Life: Exploring How Fashion Literature Fashions the Self” Felice McDowell, London College of Fashion [f.mcdowell@fashion.arts.ac.uk]

“Asian American Cook Books as Autobiographies” Tram Ngyuen, City University of New York [trnguyen@hostos.cuny.edu]

Book Reviews

Rev. of Adaptation, Intermediality and the British Celebrity Biopic MÁRTA MINIER AND MADDALENA PENNACCHIA (ED.). Emily Bowles, University of York [ejlm501@york.ac.uk]

Rev. of Autobiographical Writing by Early Modern Hispanic Women ELIZABETH TERESA HOWE. Leila Moayeri Pazargadi, Nevada State College [leila.pazargadi@nsc.edu]

Rev. of The Memory Effect: The Remediation of Memory in Literature and Film. RUSSELL J. A. KILBOURN and ELEANOR TY (EDS.). Jeffrey Clapp, Hong Kong Institute of Education [jmclapp@eduhk.hk]

Rev. of De@r World: Contemporary Uses of the Diary KYLIE CARDELL. Lena Karlsson, Lunds Universitet [lena.karlsson@genus.lu.se]

Notes on Contributors


Ricia Anne Chansky, Ph.D.
University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez
Fulbright Specialist in US Studies – Literature
Editor, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies
www.tandfonline.com/raut
www.iaba-americas.org


*       *       *

IABA-L: A LIST FOR LIFE WRITING
International Auto/Biography Association
https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/
——————————

3. Mass Observation’s 80th Anniversary Conference, 10-11 July 2017

Celebrating 80 years of the Mass Observation movement

10th-11th July 2017
Jubilee building, University of Sussex

Confirmed Speakers:
Matt Cook (Birkbeck)
James Hinton (Professor Emeritus Warwick University)
Joe Moran (Liverpool John Moores)
Lucy Noakes (University of Brighton)
Lucy Robinson (University of Sussex)
Dorothy Sheridan (University of Sussex and current Trustee of the Mass Observation Archive)

Register for the Conference
Registration for the conference is now open: http://onlineshop.sussex.ac.uk/product-catalogue/conference-seminars/the-mass-observation-archive/mass-observation-80th-anniversary-conference

The fees are as follows:
• Standard delegate rate: £100
• Student (undergraduate, postgraduate, doctorate etc), Mass Observer, and Friends of the Archive rate: £60
Delegates are invited to attend the conference dinner at Al Duomo (7 Pavilion Buildings, Brighton, East Sussex) on Monday 10th July. The fee for attending is £35.

Further information about the conference and accommodation can be found on our website: http://www.massobs.org.uk/conference

This conference is sponsored by Adam Matthew Digital

——————————

4. [MASSOBS] REMINDER: 12th May Diary Day

Every year Mass Observation puts out a call for people across the U.K to contribute to our archive of everyday life in Britain by writing a diary of their day on this date. For further information please follow this link
http://www.massobs.org.uk/write-for-us/12th-may.

We welcome contributions from all ages and there is no deadline for submission.

——————————

5. new publication: The Phenomenology of Autobiography: Making it Real

The Phenomenology of Autobiography: Making it Real
By Arnaud Schmitt
© 2017 – Routledge

https://www.routledge.com/The-Phenomenology-of-Autobiography-Making-it-Real/Schmitt/p/book/9781138710290

About the Book
Taking a fresh look at the state of autobiography as a genre, The Phenomenology of Autobiography: Making it Real takes a deep dive into the experience of the reader. Dr. Schmitt argues that current trends in the field of life writing have taken the focus away from the text and the initial purpose of autobiography as a means for the author to communicate with a reader and narrate an experience. The study puts autobiography back into a communicational context, and putting forth the notion that one of the reasons why life writing can so often be aesthetically unsatisfactory, or difficult to distinguish from novels, is because it should not be considered as a literary genre, but as a modality with radically different rules and means of evaluation. In other words, not only is autobiography radically different from fiction due to its referentiality, but, first and foremost, it should be read differently.

——————————

6. Memories, Marks and Imprints (5/31/2017; 11/20-21/2017) France

Memories, Marks and Imprints
November 20-21, 2017
CELEC, Université Jean Monnet, Saint- Etienne, France
Organized by : Elisabeth Bouzonviller, Floriane Reviron-Piégay and Emmanuelle Souvignet

Call for papers:
Memory as the faculty to keep and recall past states of consciousness and what is associated with them cannot be distinguished from the numerous forms adopted by its expression. If, at first, “marks” and “imprints” can be perceived as synonymous, their interconnections are more subtle and complex. Marks and imprints seem to involve the body rather than the intellect, on the other hand, memories seem more intangible and pertain to a more intellectual sphere. Nevertheless, they rely on the individual’s capacity to register impressions related to the body, in a manner which is more or less perfect or flawed. Despite the enmity between memory and writing pointed out by Plato’s Phaedrus, memory cannot be dissociated from the writing process with its deletions, erasures, drafting and re-writing, which are so many marks of it. Marks are far less formal than prints since marks are almost always linked to some sort of injury, abduction, aggression, which is not the case for imprints which rely on the input of material (Jacques Clauzel)[1]. This material aspect of things requires that we should consider the very nature of marks and prints: is the memory act accidental (outbreak memory) or is it the result of a remembering effort (reconstructing memory)? In both cases, we shall consider the relationship between the three terms from the standpoint of omission, oblivion or, on the contrary, comprehensiveness. If, in both cases (marks and imprints), the body is involved, memory and its relationship with injury and pain shall be considered: is the created work a remedy, a suture, or, on the contrary, a simple scar, a stigma of the painful past? In other words, what is the role of this mark or imprint? Imprints, which are related to impression, also lead us to think of the links between perception and sensation as memory –whether individual or collective, whether the result of an outbreak or a reconstruction– is a form of impressionistic perception: it works, like impressionism, by association of ideas and selection. Memory mixes sensations and images linked by similarities and closeness, thus a memory calls forth another one, like a dot, in an impressionist painting, which cannot be read independently.
One of the goals of this conference will be to reconsider the link between memory and its various ways of being expressed: memory particularly expresses itself in introspective and intimate works like memoirs, an in-between literary genre at the crossroads of annals, diary, autobiography, which will need to be redefined. But fiction can also convey memory when it tries to evoke significant historical events. The writer’s task is then to pay tribute, to make a memorial, to leave marks for those unable to do it or to leave traces of previous texts or works. In this respect, presentations on the contemporary use of canonical works, the way some texts recall other texts, and any other forms of intertextuality, will be welcome.
Lastly, another aspect could be considered; the link between memory and space, since collective memory necessarily involves a spatial frame (Halbwachs). Thus, the artistic monument, whether literary or real, might be studied, together with the links between architecture and text. No matter what its nature is, the memorial work is supposed to build and perpetuate a memory –maybe one’s own first– if we assume that famous works by great writers are more enduring monuments than marble ones. In that respect, marks and monuments are different since the formers are the result of a distortion, a rupture, a deposit that can always be erased, whereas the latter assert their presence massively and materially; marks pertain to unintended residues Jean-Luc Martine says[2], which is not the case of monuments as they freeze presence in a sort of eternity. It will then be necessary to go beyond the monuments/marks dichotomy to see how memory is embodied in certain specific places (like mausoleums, epitaphs, funerary monuments, historical conservation sites, any type of monument designed to pay tribute to certain events, social groups or memorable figures).
The various literary, sociological, philosophical or artistic forms of expression of memory in Anglo-Saxon and Hispanic cultures will be the object of interest of this conference, whether they are collective, familial or individual.

Presentations will be in English, Spanish or French.
Abstract (about 300 words) and short autobiographical notices should be sent by May, 31st 2017 to:
Elisabeth Bouzonviller (elisabeth.bouzonviller@univ-st-etienne.fr)
Floriane Reviron-Piégay (floriane.reviron.piegay@univ-st-etienne.fr)
Emmanuelle Souvignet (emmanuelle.souvignet@univ-st-etienne.fr)

*       *       *

IABA-L: A LIST FOR LIFE WRITING
International Auto/Biography Association
https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/

——————————

7. Unplotted Stories: Creative Essays on Living Without a Relationship Script (8/1/2017) Edited Collection

Unplotted Stories:
Living Without A Relationship Script

A Collection of Creative Essays

Edited by Susannah B. Mintz and Susan Walzer
Skidmore College

Unplotted Stories is a unique collection of original creative nonfiction about relationship experiences that do not conform to normative plotlines or have happy endings, experiences that leave us feeling adrift, unmoored, stalled, stuck, and befuddled. What happens when we find ourselves off the relational grid without any obvious map back, when our lives with others go to pieces—and do not get put back together again? How do we talk about forms of intimate relation for which there are no obvious social models—no TV shows, no Hallmark cards, no Hollywood movies, national holidays, or popular music? What is our relationship “status” if we’re ambiguously involved in something resistant to resolution? How do we write the stories of our connections to others when those stories defy social expectations for things like “arc,” “trajectory,” or “momentum”?

We are raised on tales with endings. Happy or otherwise, the plots that inform our developing sense of who we are, of what is possible in life—and acceptable—ultimately get somewhere. Someone looking for work will get a job. Someone who becomes a parent will see the child grow up. Someone ill or in pain will get better. Single people seeking partners will find them. If those relationships end, they will enter new ones. While there are many ways to exist outside of conventional boxes, our collection focuses on relational questions in part because it is so difficult, even in 2017, to be upfront about living outside of coupledom or traditional forms of friendship and family. As Sara Eckel observes, “The major voices in the woman-going-it-alone genre are never alone for all that long. Are women only able to lead respectable single lives when they have the power of refusal? Do you have to make clear that guys dig you?” And this question pertains not just to heterosexuals. In the midst of the good news about same-sex marriage equality being approved by the Supreme Court, Michael Cobb commented drily, “Now all of us single people are pathetic, not just the straight ones.”

We seek work that offers readers a sense of community in the context of difference. We are interested not only in examples of alternatives to the conventional relational tropes, but also in essays that explore the challenges of finding language with which to talk about those alternatives. When our life situations do not neatly align with available rhetorical paradigms, we must discover—or create—new ones, must direct our imaginative powers to crafting tales that others (and we ourselves) can understand.

Examples of what we mean by “unplotted stories” might include (and are not limited to) the following:

* Being single, and still single, and yes, still single after all these years
* Living alone, but not necessarily by “choice” (the partner left, the children are launched)
* Choosing not to have kids, but not necessarily without regret
* Friendships that tread, maybe uneasily, thresholds of eroticism, exclusivity, or mutual need
* A child who gets sick—and doesn’t get better again
* A marriage that comes apart—but not all the way
* Parenting, in its many forms
* Extended family relationships that might take the place of the ones we’re taught should be primary

Please send c.v. and completed essays of 10-12 pages/5,000 words to both editors by August 1, 2017. Queries accepted. smintz@skidmore.edu and swalzer@skidmore.edu

About the Editors

Susannah B. Mintz is Professor of English at Skidmore College. She is the author of three scholarly monographs, co-editor of a critical collection on Nancy Mairs, and numerous articles in the fields of disability studies, autobiography, and seventeenth-century literature. Creative work has appeared in The Writer’s Chronicle, Birmingham Poetry Review, Epiphany, Ninth Letter, Life Writing, Michigan Quarterly Review, and elsewhere. A collection entitled Paper Cranes: 3 Essays was a finalist for the Epiphany chapbook contest (2015). She is the author of the Kindle Single “Match Dot Comedy” (2013) and winner of the 2014 South Loop National Essay Prize, and was a finalist for the 2010 William Allen nonfiction prize. Her work was named in the 2010 Best American Essays Notable list.

Susan Walzer is Professor of Sociology at Skidmore College.  A former clinical social worker, she is the author of Thinking about the Baby: Gender and Transitions into Parenthood as well as numerous articles and book chapters about family relationships, interactions, and roles.  Her work has been published in academic outlets such as the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships and reprinted in sociology readers.  She has served as a consultant on interpersonal matters in a variety of venues and is currently working on a project about academic shame.


*       *       *

IABA-L: A LIST FOR LIFE WRITING
International Auto/Biography Association
https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/

——————————

 

Last updated: 12 May 2017


ESRC_50th-ANNIVERSARY-LOGO-RGB-blue-white-gold

Recent Posts